Adam Ouston, Mine

- Adam Ouston has written a thoroughly engrossing novel. Magical, deep and an absolute joy to read. 

- Ouston’s focus is on men at the extremes. His first novel Waypoints, published four years ago (which I reviewed here), explored the same theme. 

- An old man in his late seventies, a poet and retired academic, falls down a mine shaft in Northwest Tasmania. He’s severely injured, and can't see a way out. He’s desperate for water and to relieve his pain by moving. But if he sucks the drip near him will he be poisoned? But he's dying of thirst so is it worth the risk? He reflects on his life, his passions, and his deceased friend the journalist who shared his anger at the world. The old man attended his funeral service and was unimpressed by the superficiality of it, especially the comments by friends and colleagues.The tepid mundanity of it angered him. 

-  What sort of person emerges from his reflections, memories and stories? An angry, unhappy one. A man with a ‘natural tendency to understatement and rumination’. A university lecturer who loved the word ‘bullshit’. His students did too. He was interested ‘in getting to the bottom of things’. Tasmania was ‘a cartography of sighs’ and nature a ‘gnashing machine of time’. 'It could be said he'd long been in possession of an issue with authority...protesting pulp mills, dams, deforestation, and the grubby practices of governing bodies, good old-fashioned Tasmanian dissent facing off against good old-fashioned Tasmanian corruption...'

- The novel is one long sentence of 278 pages. The man's thoughts, registered in poetic and fluid prose, are winding and loose, and glide smoothly in and out of the major events in his long life. The reader can’t help but be captivated by this man and his magnificent descriptions of nature and its wild glory. 

- As for the men 'in extremis', We're immersed in the Mount Lyell Mining and Railway Company and its ‘secrets, half-truths and straight up lies’. Copper mining was the obsession a century ago and the mining boom continued, with its smelters and railroads. '...it was staggering what some people did and allowed to be done to something so precious, something so beautiful, so meaningful...he could not fathom the irrespressible greed...how could it be that greed was the most robust condition? not love or lust or ambition, but greed...'. 

- We're reminded of the tragic story of the research expedition deep into the Antarctic by Sir Douglas Mawson over a century ago, and the subsequent missions by ships to the icebergs to rescue ships and crews, and confront illegal whale hunters. The old man was on one of them, the Aurora. 

- The early explorers of the 16/17/18th centuries believed there must have been a  southern landmass with ‘fifty million souls’ or so. Scottish geographer Alexander Dalrymple was certain, and the British were determined to explore it. 

- We're taken deep into the detail of the disaster of the North Mt Lyell mine in 1912. There were dangerous tunnel collapses, fires, choking black smoke and poisonous carbon monoxide. And no alarm system, and the cage got stuck. Dozens of men, some 1000 feet underground, lost their lives despite the bravery of rescuers who did all they could. And many more suffered from illnesses related to coughing and breathing for the rest of their truncated lives. The author absolutely immerses us in this horror. 

- 'For beauty is nothing but the beginning of terror' (Rilke). The novel ends with the old man thinking about 'the nature of evil, the emptiness of evil, the way it can lurk in beauty or come dressed as beauty...' And he thinks about the ship Aurora and its crew and passengers trapped in the Antarctic ice, forever. And there's a full stop at the end. And that's meaningful.

Bernard Keane, Seize the Moment

 

- Crikey's politics editor Bernard Keane, easily the best political journalist in the country, has written such a detailed and important book that everybody with half a brain should be forced to read it. 

- Bernard is often personal, as he draws on his time in the public service and later as a journalist, which often adds a human dimension to the serious and substantial public issues he dissects and critiques. 

- His focus is how Australia will fare in the next 25 years. Surprisingly, he's optimistic. Chapter 1 is a superb summary of our recent history and the necessary pathways into the future. 'The coming 25 years will be dominated by multiple challenges: technological change that may well be even faster and more profound than that of the last quarter century, a rapidly ageing population, a deepening climate crisis, an increasingly powerful and high-tech China and a US empire in retreat both from its strategic role internationally and from the democratic norms it has long promoted, if not always followed'. 

- He explores five areas Australia must focus on: decarbonisation and new green industries, a new strategic direction that moves beyond the utter rubbish of our 'shared values' with the US and AUKUS, a well funded tertiary education sector, a continued celebration of immigration and multiculturalism, and a reformed tax system that improves its fairness and is sufficient to fund the necessary government services we need.

- In his climate change chapter he clearly outlines where Australia is currently wrong. We’re killing ourselves. He also outlines in detail our renewables challenge and how increasingly central China is. 

- His final chapter delves deep into the policy development processes in governments over the years and how bogged down in fussy detail and timidity they've now become: 'How we reverted from Keating's standing on our own feet to Albanese's bending the knee...federal governments of both sides have lost the ability to undertake significant reforms and hard decisions, and the country has stagnated and been allowed to drift as a result'. And there are exorbitantly paid 'consultants' in every nook and cranny.  

- At the end Keane outlines why he thinks it's time to reform our voting system because politics doesn’t relate to young people. In fact our politicians work against them. The system should be weighted: His argument is clear and convincing: 'For argument's sake, you could multiply the vote of under-30s by 1.3 and that of 30- to -60-year-olds by 1.1)'. 

- I can't recommend this insightful treatise highly enough. 

(No index and no author photo. Typical of the cheap Allen&Unwin)

Omar Musa, Fierceland

- This novel, surprisingly, won the 2026 Miles Franklin Award, an award that focuses on novels that examine the Australian way of life. Most people, including me, were surprised by that decision, as Fierceland is only tangentially about Australia. While it's a deep dive into ugly colonialism and it’s destructive legacy, it doesn’t hold back on constantly immersing us in things Malaysian - the language, politics, towns, forests, trees, wildlife, beliefs, spirits, birds, and insects. It offers an incredibly rich tapestry of Borneo's political history and corruption. 

- It's a totally absorbing read, written in brilliant prose, thick with lush detail. Sure, it's often clogged, but it's poetic and throbbing with life. Read it slowly. Let it sink in. 

- The central focus is on two kids from a very wealthy family - the delightful and spunky Rozana, and her clever younger brother Harun. Their father, whom they love, has made a fortune from clearing forests to establish a palm-oil industry in Borneo. They're sent to Australia to attend high school and university. In later life they reflect on 'the horrors of high school in Australia' and its 'mediocre parochialism'. Both are frequently bullied at school for being Mussies and are questioned about their 'terrorism' by classmates after 9/11. They have to pretend to be real Aussies in dress and accent to be accepted. Roz, in particular, gets into weed and shoplifting.

- We follow them through the first two decades of the 2000's. Roz does well in Art and English at school (so her father buys her a Jaguar!). She eventually becomes an artist. Harun becomes a tech enthusiast who establishes his own successful company. 

- One character in the book is fascinating and breathes life into it - the distant relative 'Crazy Auntie'. She's a passionate critic of the wealthy palm oil parents and their destructive colonial operations. And the kids get persuaded by her - Roz in particular because they share a love of books and reading. 

- In 2018 the father, Abah, dies. After the funeral Crazy Auntie and other relatives indulge in rants about Old Malaysia, New Malaysia - ‘same old politics. Same kleptocracy, same ethno-nationalist fascism, same Malay Supremacy. The mainland using the Borneo states...As we watched the country crumble into corruption, mediocrity and madness…’ 

- Roz and Harun are finally awakened to reality. The final chapters of the novel see them walking through the magic forests and hearing the voices of those who've suffered from their destruction. 

- Borneo is neither a single country nor exclusively a region of Malaysia—it is the third-largest island in the world, and it is shared among three separate sovereign nations:

1. Malaysia: Occupies the northern portion of the island (East Malaysia), which consists of two states—Sabah and Sarawak—and the Federal Territory of Labuan.
2. Indonesia: Occupies the largest portion (roughly 73% of the island), known as Kalimantan, which is divided into five provinces.
3. Brunei: An independent sultanate located entirely on the northern coast of Borneo, surrounded by the Malaysian state of Sarawak.

So while parts of Borneo belong to Malaysia, Borneo itself is an island shared by Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei. (Gemini).

Amy Remeikis, Screw Nice.

- This book is brilliant on every level. Amy Remeikis is easily one of Australia's best political journalists and cultural commentators. She's the Chief Political Analyst at  The Australia Institute and a contributing editor for The New Daily. 

- She's angry and she's a fighter. And she's very well informed. Screw Nice (or as I'm sure she would have preferred to call it, 'Fuck Nice') is a fascinating critique of our current social and political world - a mix of philosophical, psychological, and economic. She puts the bomb under so much bullshit. 

- What I found most appealing about the book is its reach. She ranges widely and takes us to the US, the UK and Europe, as well as Australia. She's excellent on the major post-World War 2 economic and political histories - neoliberalism, stagflation, oil shocks, wealth inequality, the destruction of labour unions, media power, hate speech, anti-immigration movements, women’s appeasement and submission for financial reasons, the general decline of liberal democracies and the current ‘autocratisation’ and growing authoritarianism in the Trump era. And of course the extraordinary growth and influence of powerful billionaires. 

- She also focuses on the individuals that are central to the madness we are forced to stomach, for instance Trump, the draft dodger, sexual predator and liar; Charlie Kirk and his lies and distortions; and Netanyahu. There are plenty of others. 

- She catalogues Australia’s dismal record on a host of important issues. 

- The book is full of statistics and details which enrich it enormously.  And quotes from influential thinkers, philosophers, politicians, and activists. Being 'nice' or 'civil' or 'centrist' or 'balanced' is just being captured and accomodating. 

- Her final words are:

'I am not a nice person. 

I try to be kind and compassionate. I like to think I am empathic and reasonable. I have an open mind, and I believe in equality. But niceness? Pretending a civil society is not tolerating abuse or hatred, or punching down on those already fighting for survival? I’m done with that. And I am hopeful for the sake of decency, for upholding the society we all should be fighting for. A tolerant society - intolerant of the intolerable - one that lays claims to actual civility and not the toxic civility we allow to oppress what we know is right. And I hope that you are too. 

Not being nice may be the only way we can create safe spaces for everyone, where equality and tolerance of difference is the standard, not the fight. 

And honestly, wouldn’t that be nice?'